Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 31;6(4):423–433. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.03.006

Table 3.

Factor estimates of specific indirect effects following adjustment for gender.

Factor β Bootstrap bias-corrected 95%CI (lower, upper)
Empowering→enjoymentb 0.32a 0.19, 0.47
Empowering→MVPAb 3.11a 0.79, 6.30
Empowering→BF%b −0.19a −0.47, −0.05
Empowering→enjoymentc 0.01 −0.02, 0.05
Empowering→MVPAc 0.12 −0.15, 0.66
Empowering→BF%c −0.01 −0.06, 0.01
Autonomous motivation→MVPA 6.23a 1.49, 11.69
Autonomous motivation→BF% −0.49a −0.91, −0.08
Controlled motivation→MVPA −0.28 −1.31, 0.42
Controlled motivation→BF% 0.02 −0.02, 0.10
Enjoyment→BF% −0.59a −1.35, −0.12

Notes: The phantom model approach does not allow for estimation of standardised effects. Results are therefore presented in their unstandardised form.

Abbreviations: BF% =  percent body fat; CI = confidence interval; MVPA = moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

a

Significance indicated via 95%CI.

b

Tested via autonomous motivation.

c

Tested via controlled motivation.