Table 2.
Variable | Mean | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1.48 | 0.50 | ||||||||
2. Age | 33.40 | 7.46 | 0.13 | |||||||
3. Education | 2.15 | 0.82 | -0.17* | -0.48** | ||||||
4. Dyadic tenure | 3.06 | 3.41 | 0.01 | 0.36** | -0.24** | |||||
5. Green Leader | 3.04 | 0.96 | -0.20** | -0.06 | 0.16* | 0.08 | 0.85 | |||
6. Value congruence | 4.07 | 0.86 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.15* | 0.23** | 0.86 | ||
7. Green behavior | 4.82 | 0.83 | 0.12 | 0.08 | -0.04 | 0.10 | 0.15* | 0.32** | 0.91 | |
8. Green identity | 3.71 | 0.78 | 0.04 | -0.14 | 0.01 | -0.10 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.87 |
n = 193. Reliability coefficients of our sample are reported along the diagonal in bold. Green leader, green transformational leadership. Education are categorical variables. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (two-tailed).