Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 10;11(4):344–353. doi: 10.1159/000492116

Table 2.

Comparison of biochemical variables by tertiles of dietary ω-6:ω-3 PUFA ratio

Tertile 1 ω-6:ω-3 <8.39:1 (n = 56) Tertile 2 ω-6:ω-3 ≥ 8.39:1 - ≤ 11.74:1 (n = 57) Tertile 3 ω-6:ω-3 < 11.74:1 (n = 58) p value
Total cholesterol, mg/dl 181.9 ± 5.0 188.7 ± 4.8 192.0 ± 4.8 0.364
HDL-c, mg/dl 46.6 ± 1.5 43.3 ± 1.4 42.4 ± 1.5 0.134
LDL-c, mg/dl 109.9 ± 4.7 117.8 ± 4.5 118.9 ± 4.4 0.346
VLDL-c, mg/dl 24.4 ± 2.0a 26.2 ± 1.9a,b 31.8 ± 1.8b 0.019
Triglycerides, mg/dl 126.8 ± 10.0a 133.5 ± 9.4ª, b 161.1 ± 9.5b 0.035
Glucose, mg/dl 86.2 ± 1.4a 90.5 ± 1.4a,b 91.6 ± 1.4b 0.023
Insulin, µU/ml 7.7 ± 1.4a 13.9 ± .5b,c 15.0 ± 1.4c 0.001
HOMA-IR 2.1 ± 0.3a 3.0 ± 0.3a,b 3.7 ± 0.3b 0.002
Adiponectin HMW, µg/ml 3.7 ± 0.3 3.0 ± 0.3 2.9 ± 0.3 0.061

TC = Total cholesterol; HOMA-IR = homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; HMW = high molecular weight.

Values are shown as mean and standard error. Data were adjusted by sex and energy intake. Means with the same letter subscripts are equal. Means with different letter subscripts are different.