Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2018 Sep 25;57(40):5864–5876. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00783

Table 3:

Averaged protein-substrate interaction energy.

Glucose maltose maltotriose maltotetraose
GLU1 GLU2 MAL1 MAL2
tmMBP1 −55.5 ± 0.35 (−27.8) −42.6 ± 0.18 (−21.3)a −79.4 ± 0.09 (−26.5) −90.0 ± 0.44 (−22.5)c
tmMBP2 −55.7 ± 0.10 (−27.8) −24.8 ± 0.27(−12.4)b −79.4 ± 0.13 (−26.5) −92.0 ± 0.36 (−23.0)c
tmMBP3 −40.0 ± 0.18 −33.6 ± 0.09a −72.6 ± 0.14 (−36.3)c
ecMBP −26.6 ± 0.15a −33.9 ± 0.20a −62.2 ± (−31.1) −81.1 ± (−27.0) −78.5 ± (−19.6)
tlMBP −68.3 ± (−34.2)

All values are shown in kcal/mol. The values in parenthesis are per sugar unit.

a

indicates that substrate changed significantly from the original orientation as a number of protein-substrate contacts are broken

b

indicates that substrate was completely ejected out of the binding pocket. GLU1/GLU2 and MAL1/MAL2 indicate two different simulations with substrate alternate sites (see Figure 4 and its legend for details).

c

indicates the substrate in complex with the protein for X-ray solved in this study. The errors associated are provided; see SI text for details on how the errors were calculated.