Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 9;8(9):274. doi: 10.3390/mi8090274

Table 1.

Active micromixers reported in recent five years.

Energy Source Characteristic Mixing Time (s) Re Mixing Efficiency Reference
Electrical field Conductive sidewall 0.033 <1 - [21] b
Ferrofluid flow 20 - - [23] c
Circular copper electrodes 110 - >90% [20] b
Asymmetric lateral structure - - 100% 2 [26] a
Floating electrode 1.15 - 95% 3 [25] c
Pressure field Pulse width modulation - 83–125 90% 2 [15] a
Braille Pin Actuator 0.5 4 90% 2 [14] b
Rotary peristaltic micropump 1 - 90% 4 [7] c
Single-chamber micropumps 0.45 0.03–30 92% 2 [16] a
Magnetic field Permanent magnet 80 - 90% 2 [57] c
Magnetohydrodynamic Actuation - 0.12 81% 1 [47] a
Rotating magnetic field - - 90–92% 2 [52] c
Hybrid gradient magnetic field 8 - 97–99% 4 [48] a
rotating magnetic microbeads 2.5–9 - - [54] c
Sound field Bubble cavitation 0.100 0.01 92% 2 [38] b
Vibrating membrane 0.003 - 90% 3 [6] c
Bubbles 0.05 0.01 93% 2 [43] b
Micro-pillars 6 - - [40] b
Sharp-edges 0.18 - - [36] b

a Research including only simulated results. b Research including only experimental results. c Research including both of simulated and experimental results. 1 Mixing Index calculated based on Equation (1). 2 Mixing Index calculated based on Equation (2). 3 Mixing Index calculated based on Equation (3). 4 Mixing Index calculated based on Equation (4).