Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 14;24(38):4330–4340. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i38.4330

Table 1.

Highlight on some recent studies exploring the efficacy of different direct acting antivirals combinations in Egypt

Ref. Year of publication Number of patients Regimen used Sustainted virologic response rate
Ruane et al[22] 2015 60 Sofosbuvir and ribavirin for 12 wk or 24 wk 68% for 12 wk or 24 wk and 93% for patients treated for 24 wk
Doss et al[23] 2015 103 Sofosbuvir and ribavirin for 12 wk or 24 wk 77% in patients treated for 12 wk and 90% for patients treated for 24 wk
Elsharkawy et al[24] 2017 14409 Triple; sofosbuvir, pegylated interferon and ribavirin versus dual; sofosbuvir and ribavirin 94% with triple therapy and 78.7% with dual therapy
El Kassas et al[25] 2018 7042 Different combinations used 82.9%-100.0%
Ahmed et al[26] 2018 300 Sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir with or without ribavirin for 12-24 wk 96.55% and 84.54%
Abd-Elsalam et al[27] 2018 2400 Sofosbuvir and ribavirin 71.20%.
El Kassas et al[28] 2018 10083 A 4-wk lead-in phase of sofosbuvir, pegylated interferon and ribavirin followed by 12 wk therapy with sofosbuvir and daclatasvir versus 12 wk therapy with sofosbuvir and daclatasvir 100% in those whoe received the lead in phase treatment regimen and 98.9% in those who received sofosbuvir and daclatasvir only
El-Khayat et al[29] 2017 583 Sofosbuvir and simeprevir for 12 wk 95.70%
Eletreby et al[30] 2017 6211 Sofosbuvir and simeprevir for 12 wk 94.00%
Abdel-Moneim et al[31] 2018 946 Sofosbuvir, daclatasvir versus Sofosbuvir, daclatasvir and ribavirin 95% and 92%
Omar et al[34] 2018 18378 Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir 95.10%.
El-Khayat et al[35] 2018 144 Ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir 99.00%
Elsharkawy et al[36] 2018 337042 Different combinations used 82.7% to 98.0%