Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 16;7(4):69. doi: 10.3390/mi7040069

Table 2.

Comparison of light modulation performances with MEMS/NEMS tunable Si photonic devices, plasmonic devices, mechanically tunable metamaterials, and chip-scale optomechanic devices.

Metrics Tuning Range Modulation Depth Operation Speed Reference
Configurations & Actuation Methods
MEMS/NEMS tunable Si photonic devices Electrostatic Moderate High Fast Refer to Table 1
MEMS/NEMS tunable plasmonic devices, for guided mode Electrostatic Moderate High Fast [115]
Mechanically tunable metamaterials, for free-space light Thermal Moderate High Slow [140,141,142,143]
Electrostatic Wide High Moderate [144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161]
Magnetoelastic Moderate Low Slow [162,163]
Chip-scale optomechanics Driving with optical force Small Low Ultra-fast [133,134,135]