Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Public Health Manag Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;24(5):E20–E27. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000686

TABLE.

Overview of the Data Submitted by Each Grantee for the Pilot Project

Florida Maine New York State Washington Wisconsin
Geography level CT: LBW Zip code: AMI HMP: CL HMP and town: PWW CT: AMI and LBW CT: LBW Zip code: AMI Zip code: AMI and LBW
Need for geographic aggregation No N/Aa Yes (using GAT) Either geographic or temporal (eg, single year with CT aggregation) Yes (using GAT)
Need for temporal aggregation Yes (5 y, 2009–2013) Yes (5 y for CL, 2009–2013) Yes (5 y, 2008–2012) Yes (5 y, 2009–2013) Yes (5 y, 2009–2013)
State suppression policy None Suppress counts <6 No sub-county-level data sharing (must submit rates) Small numbers guidelinesb Suppress counts <5

Abbreviations: AMI, acute myocardial infarction; CL, childhood lead; CT, census tract; GAT, Geographic Aggregation Tool; HMP, Healthy Maine Partnership service areas; LBW, low birth weight; N/A, not applicable; PWW, private well water.

a

HMPs are aggregations of towns.

b

Washington State Department of Health Guidelines for Working with Small Numbers can be accessed at http://www.doh.wa.gov/Portals/1/Documents/5500/SmallNumbers.pdf