Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 5;91(1085):20170434. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170434

Table 3.

Summary of studies addressing the effect of demographic characteristics on CT usage in children in emergency departments

Age
  Larson et al2 CT use in the ED was greater in adolescents and school-aged children than in preschool-aged children and infants or toddlers during the entire study period (1995–2008).
  Adelgais et al17 Children 8 years and older were 1.5 times more likely to have a Cervical spine CT than younger children.
  Broder et al40 Increases in CT utilization were most pronounced in adolescents ages 13 to 17 years (62–731% increase across CT types in adolescents compared to 8–283% increase in children aged 3–12).
  Blackwell et al50 CT was used more frequently in the older age groups: 11–13% order rate in children up to 4 years, in comparison with 32% order rate in children aged 10 to 18 years.
  Fahimi et al41 The youngest age group (aged 0–3 years) had no significant change in the proportion undergoing CT scanning, whereas the 4- to 12-year-old and 12- to 18-year-old groups exhibited significant increases in CT use (about 6-fold and 4-fold increases, respectively).
  Grim et al53 CT use was almost 2-fold greater in 12- to18-year-old children compared to 6- to 12-year-old children.
  Mannix et al90 Older age was associated with higher CT use in paediatric head trauma [OR = 1.3, 95% CI (1.1 to 1.5)].
  Marin et al48 Compared with infants, all age groups had decreased odds of any CT type.
  Shahi et al11 Patients aged 0–1 years had higher odds of CT utilization than patients aged 13–17 years [OR = 2.27; 95% CI (2.26–2.27)].
Race
  Fahimi et al41 Black children were one-half as likely to undergo a CT scan compared with white children [OR = 0.50, 95% CI (0.31–0.81)].
  Mannix et al90 White race was associated with higher CT use in paediatric head trauma [OR = 1.5, 95% CI (1.02 to 2.1)].
  Natale et al91 White children were more likely to undergo a CT scan. This race disparity was present, however, only in low risk patients, and was not observed for high risk patients.
  Larson et al2 There was no significant difference in CT use between patients of different races from 1995 to 2008, excepting 2007.
Gender
  Marin et al48 Male patients were more likely than female patients to undergo CT scan among all EDs [OR = 1.25, 95% CI (1.20 to 1.31)].
  Fahimi et al41 Male patients were overall more likely than females to undergo CT scan [OR = 1.46, 95% CI (1.11–1.92)].
  Shahi et al11 Male patients had lower odds of CT utilization than females [OR = 0.86; 95% CI (0.86–0.86)].
  Larson et al2 There was no significant difference in CT use between male and female patients from 1995 to 2008, excepting 2000.