Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 9;9:1604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01604

Table 6.

Results of pairwise comparisons on tone accuracy in Cues * Bands * Tones three-way repeated measures ANOVA by Backgrounds.

No. Background Cue Band Tone order Mean (SD)
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
1 QUI ORI B04 T4(= T2 = T1 = T5)>(T2 = T1 = T5 =)T3>T6a
2 B08 88% (13%) 88% (17%) 70% (17%) 98% (4%) 82% (21%) 42% (23%)
3 B16
4 TFS B04
5 B08 T5 = T2(= T1 = T3)>(T1 = T3 =)T4>T6a 75% (20%) 86% (18%) 70% (21%) 59% (13%) 88% (19%) 18% (15%)
6 B16
7 TE500 B04 T4>T2(= T3 = T5)>(T3 = T5 =)T1>T6a
8 B08 27% (23%) 52% (26%) 30% (17%) 97% (5%) 25% (16%) 5% (7%)
9 B16
10 TE50 B04 T4>T2(T1 = T3 = T5)>(T1 = T3 = T5 =)T6a
11 B08 22% (25%) 36% (30%) 15% (14%) 86% (13%) 12% (12%) 4% (7%)
12 B16
13 SSN ORI B04 T4>T1 = T3 = T5 = T2>T6a
14 B08 79% (16%) 67% (22%) 77% (24%) 99% (4%) 73% (24%) 35% (25%)
15 B16
16 TFS B04 T1(= T3 = T5)> (T3 = T5 =)T4 = T2>T6a
17 B08 77% (14%) 55% (23%) 69% (21%) 62% (15%) 60% (24%) 29% (21%)
18 B16
19 TE500 B04 T4>T3 = T5(= T2 = T1)>(T2 = T1 =)T6a
20 B08 19% (22%) 24% (19%) 24% (20%) 76% (15%) 21% (13%) 8% (8%)
21 B16
22 TE50 B04 T4>T1 = T2 = T3 = T5 = T6a
23 B08 19% (20%) 19% (16%) 17% (17%) 55% (21%) 16% (12%) 6% (7%)
24 B16
25 2MB ORI B04 T4(= T1 = T2 = T5)>(T1 = T2 = T5) = T3>T6b 80% (23%) 80% (38%) 74% (24%) 98% (8%) 80% (26%) 35% (27%)
26 B08 T4(= T2 = T1)>(= T2 = T1) = T3>(= T3) = T5 = T6b 80% (23%) 83% (17%) 70% (30%) 98% (8%) 50% (38%) 46% (36%)
27 B16 T4(= T1)>(T1 =)T2(= T5 = T3)>(T5 = T3 =)T6b 78% (23%) 69% (21%) 46% (36%) 96% (11%) 59% (27%) 35% (29%)
28 TFS B04 T5 = T4 = T2 = T1 = T3>T6b 72% (24%) 76% (28%) 65% (29%) 80% (23%) 81% (23%) 20% (26%)
29 B08 T1 = T4 = T2(= T5 = T3)>(T5 = T3 =)T6b 76% (30%) 65% (24%) 56% (30%) 70% (25%) 59% (31%) 30% (32%)
30 B16 T5 = T2(= T1 = T3 = T6)>(T1 = T3 = T6 =)T4, T5>T6b 48% (33%) 48% (26%) 39% (29%) 22% (23%) 61% (29%) 22% (32%)
32 TE500 B04 T4>T2 = T5 = T3 = T1 = T6b 9% (19%) 20% (28%) 15% (21%) 70% (25%) 19% (21%) 9% (15%)
33 B08 T4>T2 = T5 = T3 = T1 = T6b 17% (26%) 22% (26%) 17% (24%) 56% (28%) 20% (23%) 9% (15%)
34 B16 T4>T3(= T5 = T1 = T2)>(T5 = T1 = T2 =)T6b 20% (23%) 17% (17%) 31% (24%) 83% (24%) 26% (27%) 4% (11%)
35 TE50 B04 T4(= T3 = T1 = T5 = T2)>(T3 = T1 = T5 = T2 =)T6b 17% (29%) 11% (16%) 19% (23%) 33% (30%) 15% (17%) 2% (8%)
36 B08 T4>T5 = T2 = T1 = T3 = T6b 15% (29%) 20% (28%) 11% (20%) 61% (31%) 22% (20%) 9% (19%)
37 B16 T4>T5 = T2 = T3 = T1 = T6b 11% (20%) 19% (33%) 11% (20%) 72% (26%) 26% (29%) 9% (15%)

Green cells mark T4 with the highest and T6 with the lowest accuracy.

Bold numbers mark chance accuracy (17%) or below.

a

For QUI and SSN, tone orders with the Bands collapsed were reported because of the significant three-way Cues * Bands * Tones interactions and insignificant two-way Bands * Tones interactions (Table 3).

b

For 2MB, tone orders for each Band were reported because of the significant three-way Cues * Bands * Tones interactions (Table 3), and the significant Bands * Tones interactions in each Cue in the two-way ANOVAs (Table 4).