Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun 6;1(2):91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.005

Table 4.

Overview of comorbidity risk assessment tools for bladder cancer

Study Sample size
Median
FU
CI Hazard ratio
ORC AUC
Total RC 90-d mortality OCM CSM
Taylor 2012 [11] 1141 1141 NR CCI NR NR NR NR Bootstrap: 0.702
Fairey 2009 [17] 523 523 31 mo ACE-27 NR ACE-27 moderate: 1.59; severe: 1.83 ACE-27 moderate: 1.50; severe: 1.65 NR NR
Eisenberg 2013 [10] 2403 2403 10.5 yr CCI, ECOG NR CCI: 1.73
ECOG: 1.51
CCI: 1.16
ECOG: 1.34
NR Bootstrap: 0.75
Froehner 2015 [37] 735 735 7.8 yr LMI NR 1.06 NR NR NR
Morgan 2011 [52] 220 220 NR CCI 1.30 (NS) NR NR NR Model: 0.75
Bootstrap: 0.71
Abdollah 2012 [53] 12 274 12 274 NR CCI CCI 3 vs 1: 2.86 NR NR NR 0.70
Williams 2017 [54] 6582 6582 NR CCI NR OS CCI 3 vs 1: 2.71 CSS, CCI 3 v 1: 1.17 NR OS: 0.65
CSS: 0.66

ACE-27 = Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 score; AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CCI = Charlson CI; CI = comorbidity index; CSM = cancer-specific mortality; CSS = cancer-specific survival; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score; FU = follow-up; LMI = Lee Mortality Index; NR = not recorded; NS = not significant; OCM = other-cause mortality; ORC = odds ratio for complications; OS = overall survival; RC = radical cystectomy.