Table 4.

Perceived culturally aware mentoring skill gains* as reported by mentors at the conclusion of the training

	Implementation 1 (n=13)					Implementation 2 (n=23)					Implementation 3 (n=27)
	Before [mean (SD)]	Now [mean (SD)]	M diff †	p	d z	Before [mean (SD)]	Now [mean (SD)]	M diff †	p	d z	Before [mean (SD)]	Now [mean (SD)]	M diff †	p	d z
Intentionally creating opportunities for my mentees to bring up issues of race/ethnicity when they arise	4.38 (1.50)	5.62 (1.12)	1.23	0.004	1.00	3.70 (1.11)	5.26 (1.05)	1.57	<0.001	1.58	3.85 (1.51)	5.70 (0.82)	1.85	<0.001	1.50
Encouraging mentees to think about how the research relates to their own lived experience	5.00 (1.35)	5.77 (0.93)	0.77	0.006	0.92	4.39 (1.03)	5.52 (0.79)	1.13	<0.001	1.63	4.26 (1.48)	5.52 (1.22)	1.26	<0.001	1.15
Going outside of my comfort zone to help mentees feel included in the lab	4.62 (1.39)	5.62 (1.26)	1.00	0.006	0.93	4.35 (0.98)	5.70 (0.82)	1.35	<0.001	1.37	4.56 (1.56)	5.72 (1.17)	1.16	<0.001	1.29
Respectfully broaching the topic of race/ethnicity in my mentoring relationships	4.62 (1.71)	5.54 (1.27)	0.92	0.011	0.83	3.83 (1.03)	5.43 (0.84)	1.61	<0.001	1.92	4.19 (1.33)	5.63 (1.01)	1.44	<0.001	1.33

^* Mentors were asked “Please rate how skilled you feel you were BEFORE the training and how skilled you feel you are NOW in each of the following items.” Responses could range from 1 (not at all skilled) to 7 (extremely skilled).

^† M _diff represents the mean difference between mentors’ self-reported level of skill thinking back to before the training as opposed to now, after the training.