Table 5.
Impacts and influences of CAM from interviews 24 months after training
Greater realization of their own racial and ethnic biases and insensitivities |
More comfort and proactivity talking with students about the importance of considering culture when engaging other people |
Creating better communication within a research team—more listening of people’s different experiences definitely than before |
Better engagement with historically underrepresented (HU) students, even by HU faculty |
More awareness of how personal experiences vary and can influence behavior and performance, getting more information before jumping to conclusions |
More awareness of how economic situations affect students |
In one-to-one mentoring, checking in more on personal situations of students |
Opening up to sharing more of himself so students can see how he is balancing work and life |
More open-minded and seeking more information about how personal circumstances and factors can affect academic and research performance |
Increased attention to help students problem-solve if they come from more difficult situations |
More individualized mentoring strategies |
More likely and confident to speak out when encountering false statement and biases related to experiences of diverse students |
More comfortable in her own research that deals with racial/ethnic differences and health behaviors |
More attuned to how choice of language in data interpretation and presentation in papers can be unintentionally negative toward specific groups |
More comfortable having conversations with graduate students about language in writing |