Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 8;2(2):86–94. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.25

Table 5.

Impacts and influences of CAM from interviews 24 months after training

Greater realization of their own racial and ethnic biases and insensitivities
More comfort and proactivity talking with students about the importance of considering culture when engaging other people
Creating better communication within a research team—more listening of people’s different experiences definitely than before
Better engagement with historically underrepresented (HU) students, even by HU faculty
More awareness of how personal experiences vary and can influence behavior and performance, getting more information before jumping to conclusions
More awareness of how economic situations affect students
In one-to-one mentoring, checking in more on personal situations of students
Opening up to sharing more of himself so students can see how he is balancing work and life
More open-minded and seeking more information about how personal circumstances and factors can affect academic and research performance
Increased attention to help students problem-solve if they come from more difficult situations
More individualized mentoring strategies
More likely and confident to speak out when encountering false statement and biases related to experiences of diverse students
More comfortable in her own research that deals with racial/ethnic differences and health behaviors
More attuned to how choice of language in data interpretation and presentation in papers can be unintentionally negative toward specific groups
More comfortable having conversations with graduate students about language in writing