Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 16;32(19):3032–3034. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw355

Table 2.

Comparison of simulation algorithms with respect to chromosome length (Mb), exponential expansion rate (ρ), sample size (n), and ancestral population size (A)

Time
Memory
Mb 102ρ n/103 A AR SC CS AR SC CS
100 0.0 20 20 0.48 1.42 0.12 10.1 19.6 17.3
300 0.0 20 20 2.56 0.59 15.2 41.4
500 0.0 20 20 5.35 19.8
100 0.0 1 10 0.09 0.02 0.01 6.5 0.5 0.2
100 0.0 10 10 0.12 0.27 0.02 8.5 4.9 4.4
100 0.0 100 10 1.01 6.20 52.33 12.6 48.9 6.8
100 0.0 200 10 3.05 19.4
100 0.0 300 10 10.19 24.6
100 0.347 20 10 0.39 1.37 0.07 10.5 19.6 9.0
100 0.576 20 10 0.94 2.37 13.0 39.1
100 1.151 20 10 3.97 25.0

Time

Memory
Mb 102ρ n/103 A AR10 SC0 CS0 AR10 SC0 CS0

100 0.0 20 20 0.12 1.23 0.15 8.2 19.6 17.3
300 0.0 20 20 0.46 0.89 9.7 41.4
500 0.0 20 20 0.79 11.0
100 0.0 1 10 0.02 0.02 0.01 3.3 0.5 0.3
100 0.0 10 10 0.04 0.28 0.03 7.9 4.9 4.4
100 0.0 100 10 0.34 6.36 * 8.0 48.9 *
100 0.0 200 10 0.66 * 8.4 *
100 0.0 300 10 1.59 17.6
100 0.347 20 10 0.09 2.51 0.07 8.2 39.1 8.9
100 0.576 20 10 0.15 0.13 8.6 9.4
100 1.151 20 10 0.22 12.0

Simulation parameters and setup are detailed in the Supplementary Materials. DTWF and coalescent algorithms: AR,  ARGON; SC,  SCRM; CS,  COSI2; approximate algorithms: AR10, ARGON with minimum recombination block of size 10 μM; SC0, SCRM with; ‘−l’ set to 0; CS0, COSI2 with ‘−u’ set to 0; † represents runs terminated due to insufficient memory (>60Gb) or a memory error; * indicates that the program took longer than 100 h to complete.