Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2018 Jul 5;124(17):3567–3575. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31596

Table 2.

Fertility-Related Communication among all Participants (N=146) and Separated by Sperm Banking Attempt and Successful Bankinga

All patients Sperm banking attempt Successful sperm
banking
N=146 No
(n=68)
Yes
(n=78)
No
(n=82)
Yes
(n=64)

Communication
Factors
N (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Fertility risk communication by provider
  No 33 (22.6) 27 (81.8) 6 (18.2) 29 (87.9) 4 (12.1)
  Yes 111 (76.0) 38 (34.2) 73 (65.8) 51 (45.9) 60 (54.1)
Fertility risk communication by parent
  No 35 (24.0) 31 (88.6) 4 (11.4) 31 (88.6) 4 (11.4)
  Yes 108 (74.0) 34 (31.5) 74 (68.5) 48 (44.4) 60 (55.6)
Provider recommended sperm banking
  No 58 (39.7) 43 (74.1) 15 (25.9) 47 (81.0) 11 (19.0)
  Yes 85 (58.2) 21 (24.7) 64 (75.3) 32 (37.6) 53 (62.4)
Parent recommended sperm banking
  No 60 (41.1) 48 (80.0) 12 (20.0) 50 (83.3) 10 (16.7)
  Yes 78 (53.4) 15 (19.2) 63 (80.8) 28 (35.9) 50 (64.1)
Consulted with fertility specialist
  No 114 (78.1) 60 (52.6) 54 (47.4) 73 (64.0) 41 (36.0)
  Yes 26 (17.8) 4 (15.4) 22 (84.6) 6 (23.1) 20 (76.9)
Fertility Risk, Perceived M (SD)
1.4 (0.7) 1.3 (0.8) 1.5 (0.7) 1.3 (0.7) 1.5 (0.7)
a

may not equal 100% due to missing data