Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2018 Jul 5;124(17):3567–3575. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31596

Table 3.

Health Belief Factors among all participants; Separated by Sperm Banking Attempt and Successful Banking

All patients Sperm banking attempt Successful sperm
banking
N=146 No
(n=68)
Yes
(n=78)
No
(n=82)
Yes
(n=64)

M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) M (SD)
Perceived vulnerability 15.8 (5.6) 15.2 (5.3) 16.2 (5.8) 15.5 (5.2) 16.0 (6.0)
Perceived severity 10.0 (3.8) 9.1 (3.3) 10.7 (3.9) 9.7 (3.7) 10.4 (3.8)
Barriers to banking
  Influential authority figures 19.1 (5.8) 19.6 (6.7) 18.7 (5.0) 19.1 (6.4) 19.1 (4.9)
  Social influences 17.4 (7.5) 18.9 (7.6) 16.1 (7.2) 18.3 (7.5) 16.3 (7.4)
  Concerns for future children 16.8 (4.8) 16.8 (5.7) 16.7 (3.8) 16.7 (5.5) 16.9 (3.6)
  Sperm banking logistics 29.2 (10.1) 30.4 (11.9) 28.2 (8.1) 29.6 (11.3) 28.7 (8.3)
Benefits of banking 22.2 (4.0) 19.6 (3.9) 24.0 (2.8) 20.5 (4.0) 24.0 (2.9)
Self-efficacy 14.2 (4.6) 11.8 (5.0) 16.0 (3.3) 12.2 (4.8) 16.5 (3.0)
Cues to action
  Medical 1.3 (1.1) 1.0 (1.0) 1.6 (1.1) 1.1 (1.1) 1.6 (1.1)
  Family & friends 1.4 (1.5) 1.0 (1.5) 1.7 (1.5) 1.0 (1.4) 1.9 (1.5)
  Media 0.5 (0.6) 0.6 (0.5) 0.4 (0.7) 0.6 (0.5) 0.4 (0.7)