Table 4.

Multivariate Logistic Regressions on Sperm Banking Outcomes among At-risk Adolescent Males Newly Diagnosed with Cancer (N=146)

	β	SE	p	OR	95% CI
Sperm banking attempt
Tanner Stage	1.45	0.50	.004	4.25	[1.60 – 11.27]
Parent(s) recommended banking	1.58	0.74	.032	4.88	[1.15 – 20.71]
Perceived benefits of banking	0.34	0.12	.004	1.41	[1.12 – 1.77]
Perceived barriers: Social influences	−0.13	0.05	.005	0.88	[0.81 – 0.96]
Successful sperm banking
Provider recommended banking	0.98	0.48	.039	2.67	[1.05 – 6.77]
Parent(s) recommended banking	1.10	0.50	.029	3.02	[1.12 – 8.10]
Consulted with fertility specialist	1.24	0.63	.050	3.44	[1.00 – 11.83]
Self-efficacy	0.15	0.07	.034	1.16	[1.01 – 1.33]