Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov;180:123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.010

Table 2.

Mean proportions and response times (RTs in ms) for the different response outcomes at recognition for expected and unexpected stimuli in Experiment 2 (retrieval manipulation).

Proportions RTs
Experiment 2a (Shallow encoding task)
Expected
Unexpected
Expected
Unexpected
Hits 0.84 (0.12) 0.78 (0.13) 1563 (275) 1573 (298)
FHits 0.77 (0.14) 0.72 (0.15) 1546 (278) 1550 (265)
RHits 0.06 (0.06) 0.06 (0.07) 1632 (427) 1670 (505)
CR 0.64 (0.17) 0.62 (0.17) 1431 (287) 1474 (282)
M 0.16 (0.09) 0.22 (0.12) 1521 (280) 1562 (322)
FA 0.36 (0.16) 0.38 (0.17) 1556 (315) 1550 (265)
FFA 0.35 (0.16) 0.36 (0.17) 1561 (338) 1580 (343)
RFA 0.01 (0.02) 0.02 (0.04) 1721 (622) 1876 (533)



Experiment 2b (Semantic encoding task)
Expected
Unexpected
Expected
Unexpected
Hits 0.80 (0.10) 0.78 (0.18) 1595 (231) 1601 (266)
FHits 0.52 (0.19) 0.47 (0.20) 1669 (295) 1675 (315)
RHits 0.28 (0.20) 0.31 (0.22) 1373 (262) 1372 (303)
CR 0.66 (0.23) 0.69 (0.21) 1317 (257) 1317 (253)
M 0.20 (0.10) 0.22 (0.17) 1417 (326) 1358 (297)
FA 0.34 (0.22) 0.32 (0.20) 1701 (321) 1661 (368)
FFA 0.31 (0.22) 0.29 (0.20) 1725 (357) 1693 (398)
RFA 0.03 (0.04) 0.03 (0.04) 1613 (468) 1407 (417)

Note: Numbers in the parentheses are standard deviations. FHits = familiarity hits; RHits = recollection hits; M = misses; FA = false alarms; FFA = familiarity false alarms; RFA = recollection false alarms; CR = correct rejections.