Table 3.
Analysis of molecular variance (amova) of chlorotypes and ITS ribotypes for R. crenulata populations
| Source of variation | cpDNA | ITS | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| df | SS | VC | PV(%) | F statistic | df | SS | VC | PV(%) | F statistic | |
| Among groups | 3 | 62.590 | 0.45363 Va | 93.91 | FSC = 0.03442* | 1 | 12.450 | 0.37147 Va | 69.72 | FSC = 0.47511* |
| Among populations | 12 | 0.529 | 0.00101Vb | 0.21 | FST = 0.94117 (0.003) | 14 | 18.066 | 0.07665 Vb | 14.39 | FST = 0.84106* |
| Within populations | 237 | 6.735 | 0.02842 Vc | 5.88 | FCT = 0.93907* | 237 | 20.069 | 0.08468Vc | 15.89 | FCT = 0.69720 (0.06647) |
| Total | 252 | 69.854 | 0.48306 | 252 | 50.585 | 0.53279 | ||||
df degrees of freedom, SS sum of squares, VC variance components, PV percentage of variation. FSC, correlation withinpopulations relative togroup; FST, correlation within populations relative to total; FCT, correlation within groups relative to total. *, p < 0.001, 1000 permutations. FST = 0.94117 (p = 0.003). FCT = 0.6972 (p = 0.06647)