Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 17;15:100. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0730-0

Table 3.

TIDieR item descriptions in relation to intervention promise

TIDieR itema Description Very Promising Quite Promising Non-promising
Why (rationale/theory) Adequately described 2
Not adequately described 1 3 3
What (materials) Borg scale & heart rate monitor 1
Personal log sheets & pedometer 1
Written standardised manual 1
Written information & accelerometer 1
Educational brochures 1
Gym based equipment & heart rate monitor 1 1
Not adequately described 1 1
What (procedures) Structured exercise sessions 1 1 2
Group discussions focused on self-efficacy 1
Motivational and volitional strategies 1
Physical activity Prescription 1
Goal-setting telephone follow-up program 1
Educational sessions 1
Who provided Nurse, assistant physician & social scientist 1
Physiotherapist 2 1
Nurse 1 1
Not adequately described 1 1 1
How (mode of delivery) Face to face exercise sessions 1 1 2
Face to face supported self-management 2 1
Telephone supported self-management 2
Where Canada 1
USA 1
Germany 1
Sweden 1
Denmark 1
China 1 1
Israel 1
New Zealand 1
Outpatient rehabilitation centre/clinic 1 1 1
Inpatient rehabilitation centre 1
Stroke research centre 1
Community based 1 1
Not adequately described 2
When & How Much Delivered in single session 2
Delivered over 4 weeks 1
Delivered over 8 weeks 2
Delivered over 10 weeks 1
Delivered over 12 weeks 3
Delivered in acute stages 1
Delivered in chronic stages 1 2 1
Stroke stage not adequately described 3 1
1 contact over intervention delivery period 2
8 contacts over intervention delivery period 1
12 contacts over intervention delivery period 1
24 contacts over intervention delivery period 2
28 contacts over intervention delivery period 1
30 contacts over intervention delivery period 1
36 contacts over intervention delivery period 1
Tailoring Tailored to participants 1 5 3
Not tailored to participants
Modifications Modifications reported
No modifications reported 1 5 3

aItems 11 & 12 on intervention fidelity are not displayed (assessed using Bellg et al. 2004 [30]