. 2018 Oct 17;14(10):e1006487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006487

Table 2. Correlations between post-TMS task performances and model features.

Model feature	VG		SC		NR
Model feature	r	p	r	p	r	p
Transition value	0.35	0.33	0.68^•	0.03	0.45	0.20
Transition value	[0.01, 0.70]		[0.32, 0.87]		[0.01, 0.93]
Functional effect (global brain)	0.19	0.59	0.39	0.27	0.08	0.82
Functional effect (global brain)	[-0.18, 0.63]		[-0.22, 0.81]		[-0.43, 0.57]
Functional effect (task circuit)	0.23	0.52	0.52	0.12	0.63^•	0.05
Functional effect (task circuit)	[-0.38, 0.57]		[-0.22, 0.79]		[-0.07, 0.88]
Functional effect (outside the task circuit)	0.18	0.62	0.37	0.29	0.04	0.91
Functional effect (outside the task circuit)	[-0.02, 0.71]		[-0.23, 0.80]		[-0.45, 0.54]

The variables r and p denote the Pearson correlation coefficient and associated p-value, respectively. The 90% confidence interval for r is reported below each correlation. Here a ^• denotes a significant correlation across the two scales of the brain parcellation studied in this paper (S2 Table). VG = verb generation, SC = sentence completion, and NR = number reading.