Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 17.
Published in final edited form as: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 May 15;41(7):741–749. doi: 10.1111/pace.13356

Table 2.

Latent Class Regression Model by Cluster Membership

Cluster β SE t
Highly Symptomatic Cluster vs Asymptomatic Cluster
Gender 1.77786 0.27261 6.522
Age −0.01809 0.01321 −1.370
AF type 0.53518 0.13616 3.931
Ejection Fraction −0.01776 0.01280 −1.387
Body Mass Index 0.07231 0.01837 3.936
Anti-arrhythmic 0.37695 0.26663 1.414
Heart Failure 1.09543 0.33233 3.296*
Coronary Disease 1.02034 0.30692 3.324*
Ablation 1.01345 0.27692 3.660
With Activity Cluster vs Asymptomatic Cluster
Gender 1.32675 0.20351 6.519
Age −0.00975 0.00810 −1.204
AF type 0.09330 0.10016 0.932
Ejection Fraction −0.00359 0.01041 −0.345
Body Mass Index 0.04523 0.01489 3.038*
Anti-arrhythmic 0.54034 0.18991 2.845*
Heart Failure 0.39523 0.29892 1.322
Coronary Disease 0.81976 0.23296 3.519
Ablation 0.99310 0.18785 5.287
Mild Diffuse Cluster vs Asymptomatic Cluster
Gender 0.58792 0.21488 2.736*
Age −0.01562 0.00785 −1.989*
AF type 0.20739 0.10087 2.056*
Ejection Fraction −0.02074 0.01058 −1.960
Body Mass Index 0.00117 0.01522 0.077
Anti-arrhythmic 0.07400 0.18210 0.406
Heart Failure 0.09176 0.32246 0.285
Coronary Disease −0.18319 0.28213 −0.649
Ablation 0.81038 0.18568 4.364

Covariates that are significantly different from reference (Asymptomatic Cluster) are marked with an asterisk (*) for p<0.05, and with a dagger sign (†) for p<0.001.