Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 16;50(4):1096–1105. doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.393

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics and Health Belief Model of lung cancer screening awareness

Variable Average risk (n=1,570)
High-risk (n=160)
p-value
Agreea), n (%) Mean±SD Agreea), n (%) Mean±SD
Perceived susceptibility
 Chance of getting lung cancer in lifetimeb) 388 (24.7) 2.92±0.86 60 (37.5) 3.21±0.77 < 0.001
 Possibility of getting lung cancer compared to similar age groupb) 360 (22.9) 2.91±0.83 56 (35.0) 3.23±0.72 < 0.001
 Often worry about getting lung cancerc) 312 (19.9) 2.76±0.89 40 (25.0) 2.96±0.92 0.012
Perceived severity
 Lung cancer leads to deathc) 1,220 (77.7) 3.68±1.11 135 (84.4) 3.78±0.94 0.776
 Lung cancer treatment is expensivec) 1,168 (74.4) 3.66±0.96 120 (75.0) 3.64±0.85 0.483
 5-Year survival is lowc) 1,037 (66.1) 3.46±1.09 100 (62.5) 3.36±1.12 0.325
Perceived benefits
 LDCT helps detect and treat lung cancerb) 1,022 (65.1) 3.49±0.96 108 (67.5) 3.51±0.82 0.932
Perceived barriers
 Concern about radiation exposure with LDCTb) 284 (18.1) 3.26±0.89 25 (15.6) 3.29±0.92 0.684
 LDCT is painfulb) 763 (48.6) 2.76±1.07 92 (57.5) 2.64±1.10 0.187
Cues to action
 Recommended to have lung cancer screeningd) 121 (7.7) NA 23 (14.4) NA 0.004
 Prior lung cancer screening experienced) 88 (5.6) NA 17 (10.6) NA 0.011

SD, standard deviation; LDCT, low-dose computed tomography; NA, not applicable.

a)

Number of participants who answered “Agree”/“Somewhat” or “Totally agree”/”Very much”,

b)

Comparing the mean scores between two groups using t test,

c)

Testing differences in the distribution of variables between groups using Mann-Whitney test,

d)

Two-point Likert-type scale; comparing agreement rates between groups using chi-square.