Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 11;9:2443. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02443

Table 4.

Correlations between E. coli concentration, isolation of pathogenic enteric bacteria and detection of HuNoVs.

C. jejuni and/or C. coli
C. lari
STEC/EPEC
HuNoV
E. coli
+ - + - + - + - >median <median
Sample N° 130 375 90 415 89 416 33 117 231 233
Salmonella + 30
(23.1%)
39
(10.4%)
4
(4.4%)
65
(15.7%)
16
(18.0%)
53
(12.7%)
0
(0%)
1
(0.8%)
52
(76.5%)
16
(23.5%)
Salmonella - 100
(76.9%)
336
(89.6%)
86
(95.6%)
350
(84.3%)
73
(82.0%)
363
(87.3%)
33
(100%)
116
(99.2%)
179
(45.2%)
217
(54.8%)
OR 2.58 P = 0.0004 0.25 P = 0.0089 1.50 P = 0.194 1.16 P = 0.928 3.94 P < 0.0001
RR 2.21 P = 0.0003 0.28 P = 0.0121 1.41 P = 0.186 1.16 P = 0.928 3.28 P < 0.0001
C. jejuni and/or C. coli+ 22
(24.4%)
108
(26.0%)
39
(43.8%)
91
(21.9%)
1
(3.0%)
5
(4.3%)
58
(45.0%)
71
(55.0%)
C. jejuni
and/or C. coli -
68
(75.6%)
307
(74.0%)
50
(56.2%)
325
(78.1%)
32
(96.7%)
112
(95.7%)
173
(51.6%)
160
(48.4%)
OR 0.92 P = 0.756 2.79 P < 0.0001 0.70 P = 0.749 0.755 P = 0.178
RR 0.93 P = 0.757 2.00 P < 0.0001 0.71 P = 0.750 0.82 P = 0.179
C. lari+ 14
(15.7%)
76
(18.3%)
15
(45.4%)
30
(25.6%)
43
(50.0%)
43
(50.0%)
C. lari - 75
(84.3%)
340
(81.7%)
18
(54.5%)
87
(74.4%)
188
(49.7%)
190
(50.3%)
OR 0.83 P = 0.570 2.42 P = 0.0309 1.01 P = 0.964
RR 0.86 P = 0.574 1.77 P = 0.0206 1.01 P = 0.965
STEC/EPEC+ 2
(6.1%)
9
(7.7%)
53
(60.9%)
34
(39.1%)
STEC/EPEC - 31
(93.9%)
108
(92.3%)
178
(47.2%)
199
(52.8%)
OR 0.77 P = 0.751 1.74 P = 0.022
RR 0.78 P = 0.752 1.57 P = 0.0231
Sample N∘ 74 76
HuNoV+ 13
(17.6%)
20
(26.3%)
HuNoV - 61
(52.1%)
56
(47.9%)
OR 0.60 P = 0.198
RR 0.67 P = 0.202

STEC/EPEC data were from Balière et al. (2015).

OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk, data in bold: positive regulation, data in italics: P-value > 0.05.

Samples whose E. coli concentration is greater than, or less than, the median calculated by type of sample (shellfish, river or brackish waters, seawater).