Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 1;159:171–181. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.09.014

Table 2.

Estimated parameters with posterior mean and 95% CI for random process model (A), spatial model (B), spatial rice model (C), and spatial duck model (D).

Parameter Model (A) Model (B) Model (C) Model (D) Model (E)
δ × 10−8 2.55 (2.43, 2.68) 1.23 (1.14, 1.30) 1.23 (1.16, 1.30) 0.77 (0.69, 0.84) 0.64 (0.52, 0.76)
βW × 10−6 3.60 (2.85, 4.52) 3.45 (3.22, 3.65) 0.99 (0.76, 1.12) 0.33 (0.24, 0.41)
βB × 10−5 1.71 (1.38, 2.22) 1.08 (1.03, 1.13) 0.41 (0.34, 0.52) 0.14 (0.10, 0.18)
pC 0.38 (0.29, 0.47) 0.34 (0.30, 0.38) 0.41 (0.32, 0.48) 0.28 (0.16, 0.37)
pD 0.26 (0.22, 0.31) 0.21 (0.18, 0.24) 0.03 (0.01,0.08) 0.04 (0.02, 0.09)
ξ 3.2 (2.3, 3.9) 3.6 (3.4, 3.9) 2.8 (2.3, 3.2) 2.9 (2.4, 3.7)
αR 0.71 (0.65, 0.74) 3.19 (1.98, 5.51)
ϵR 0.61 (0.58, 0.63) 0.64 (0.48, 88)
nR 3.2 (3.1, 3.3) 5.4 (3.6, 8.3)
αD 13.5 (11.2, 16.7) 16.6 (12.3, 19.4)
ϵD 3.4 (3.2, 3.7) 3.9 (3.3, 4.7)
nD 5.9 (5.0, 6.8) 5.2 (4.2, 6.4)