Skip to main content
. 2018 May 30;118(6):959–978. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1648251

Table 2. Laboratory methods to determine von Willebrand factor levels.

Measurement Principle Method Advantage Disadvantage
vWF antigen (vWF:Ag) a Quantity Antibody captures protein ELISA, LIA or flow cytometry High availability in laboratories Different cut-off values for different assays
Not sensitive for low levels
No differential sensitivity to variable molecular weight forms of vWF
vWF propeptide (vWF:pp) a Quantity Antibody captures protein ELISA Sensitive parameter for vWF release Different cut-off values for different assays
Little commercial availability
vWF ristocetin co-factor (vWF:RCo) a Activity Ristocetin induces platelet aggregation through GPIb–vWF interaction Aggregometry, standard coagulation instruments, LIA or flow cytometry High availability in laboratories
Availability at the bedside with timely results
High variation of coefficients
Limited inter-laboratory reproducibility and standardization
Poor sensitivity for low vWF levels
vWF collagen binding (vWF:CB) Activity Collagen induces vWF binding ELISA or flow cytometry Sensitivity to high molecular weight vWF
Sensitivity to low vWF levels
Little variability
Lack of comparative data
vWF activity Activity Recombinant gain of function GPIb binds to vWF LIA or ELISA Easy performance and automation
High assay accuracy and precision
Detection of vWF at low levels
Lack of comparative data

Abbreviations: ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay; GPIb, glycoprotein Ib; LIA, latex-particle immunoassay; vWF, von Willebrand factor.

Note: Key points for different assessment of von Willebrand factor.

a

Indicates tests used in stroke studies.