Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 18.
Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2018 May 24;2018:885–888. doi: 10.1109/ISBI.2018.8363713

Table 2.

Comparison of supervised learning, conventional learning, and proposed semi-supervised learning. The bold denotes the best performance for each organ.

Bladder Prostate Rectum
Supervised .952(.007) .891(.019) .884(.027)
Conventional learning .960(.006) .895(.024) .884(.031)
Proposed learning .963(.007) .903(.022) .890(.029)