TABLE VI.

Participants‘ Feedback From Two Feasibility Studies

Question: 1–6	Study 1				Study 2
	ASD (n = 6)		TD (n = 6)		ASD (n = 6)		TD (n = 6)
	Mean(Min/Max)	SD	Mean(Min/Max)	SD	Mean(Min/Max)	SD	Mean(Min/Max)	SD
1. Like the games?	3.67(1/5)	1.25	3.33 (1/4)	1.11	4.67(4/5)	0.47	4.33 (4/5)	0.47
2. Did you do well?	4.00 (2/5)	1.00	3.33 (1/4)	1.11	4.33 (4/5)	0.47	3.83 (2/5)	0.90
3. Did partner do well?	3.50(2/5)	1.12	3.17(1/4)	1.07	4.50(4/5)	0.50	4.67(4/5)	0.47
4. Important to talk?	4.00 (2/5)	1.00	4.33 (3/5)	0.75	4.83 (4/5)	0.37	4.67(4/5)	0.47
5. Important to cooperate?	4.83 (4/5)	0.37	4.83 (4/5)	0.37	4.50(4/5)	0.50	4.83 (4/5)	0.37
6. Easy to work together?	3.50(1/5)	1.38	2.83 (1/5)	1.34	3.33 (1/5)	1.37	3.67(3/5)	0.75
Question: 7–10	ASD-TD in Study 1		Choices			ASD-TD in Study 2
7. How often did you talk?	10(5/5)		“Very often”.			10(5/5)
	2(1/1)		“Only when I needed”.			2(1/1)
	0		“Very little”.			0
8. Which was most useful to learn how to play?	6(3/3)		“Talking with my partner”.			9(4/5)
	1 (0/1)		“Reading game instructions”.			2(1/1)
	5 (3/2)		“By trying several times”.			1(1/0)
9. Which was most useful to win?	11(5/6)		“Working closely with my partner”.			10 (4/6)
	1 (1/0)		“My personal performance”.			1(1/0)
	0		“Understanding the game rules”.			1(1/0)
10. Did you play better?	3(2/1)		“We played better by the end”.			11(5/6)
	8 (3/5)		“Stayed the same”.			1(1/0)
	1 (1/0)		“We played worse”.			0