Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 30.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2018 May 30;558(7708):117–121. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0170-7

Figure 3. Genetic interactions between all pairs of mutations switch from positive to negative epistasis in different genetic backgrounds.

Figure 3

a, Proportion of backgrounds (top) and species (middle) in which each pair of mutations interacts positively (orange) negatively (green) at different FDRs (n = 47,649 backgrounds). Bottom shown background-averaged epistasis (n = 87 pairs of mutations). b, Interaction networks for three species (other species in Extended Data Fig. 4b). Edge colours indicate epistasis sign (FDR<0.1) and width strength of interaction. c, Comparison of epistasis scores between these three species (rs = Spearman correlation coefficient, n = 43, 22 and 6 comparisons from left to right). d, Number of positive (orange) or negative (green) magnitude, sign or reciprocal sign pairwise epistasis (n = 10,330 significant interactions from 47,649 tested) e, Consistency of each interaction quantified as the absolute difference between the % of backgrounds in which the interaction is positive or negative. Colour indicates the predominant sign. The four pairs that restore WC bps are highlighted.