Table 2. Results of multilevel modeling for perceived physical exertion (PE).
PE0: Intercept Only | PE1: + Level 1 Predictors | PE2: + Level 2 Predictorse | PE3: + Random Coefficients | PE4: + Cross-level Interactions | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fixed Componentsa,b | |||||||||||||||
Predictor | ß [S.E.] | df | p | ß [S.E.] | df | p | ß [S.E.] | df | p | ß [S.E.] | df | p | ß [S.E.] | df | p |
1. Intercept | -0.01 [0.14] | 54 | .97 | -0.01 [0.11] | 42 | .92 | - | - | - | -0.01 [0.11] | 43 | .9 | -0.04 [0.11] | 43 | .70 |
2. Entropy of transitions | 0.15 [0.10] | 42 | .11 | - | - | - | 0.14 [0.09] | 43 | .11 | 0.15 [0.08] | 43 | .06 | |||
3. Burstiness of transitions | -0.07 [0.12] | 42 | .57 | - | - | - | -0.6 [0.10] | 43 | .58 | -0.03 [0.09] | 43 | .76 | |||
4. Time speaking outside of main work areas | -0.02 [0.10] | 42 | .84 | - | - | - | 0.03 [0.09] | 43 | .71 | 0.03 [0.09] | 43 | .78 | |||
5. Volume while speaking at nursing stations | 0.07 [0.09] | 42 | .44 | - | - | - | 0.02 [0.14] | 43 | .87 | 0.05 [0.13] | 43 | .68 | |||
6. Time at nursing stations | 0.16 [0.10] | 42 | .14 | - | - | - | 0.16 [0.10] | 43 | .10 | 0.17 [0.09] | 43 | .08 | |||
7. Environmental noise in service areas | 0.19 [0.09] | 42 | .04 | - | - | - | 0.19 [0.08] | 43 | .03 | 0.18 [0.08] | 43 | .03 | |||
8. Time walking in patient rooms | 0.09 [0.10] | 42 | .36 | - | - | - | 0.12 [0.09] | 43 | .18 | 0.12 [0.09] | 43 | .18 | |||
9. Temperature in service areas | -0.04 [0.09] | 42 | .62 | - | - | - | -0.04 [0.09] | 43 | .65 | - | |||||
10. Entropy of transitions x Burstiness of transitions | 0.19 [0.09] | 42 | .04 | - | - | - | 0.23 [0.07] | 43 | .004 | 0.22 [0.07] | 43 | .003 | |||
11. Time speaking outside of main work areas x Time at nursing stations | 0.38 [0.11] | 42 | < .001 | - | - | - | 0.38 [0.10] | 43 | < .001 | 0.37 [0.09] | 43 | < .001 | |||
12. Environmental noise in service areas x Time walking in patient rooms | -0.23 [0.10] | 42 | .02 | - | - | - | -0.21 [0.08] | 43 | .01 | -0.19 [0.08] | 43 | .02 | |||
13. Volume while speaking at nursing stations x Temperature in service areas | -0.14 [0.07] | 42 | .04 | - | - | - | -0.02 [0.08] | 43 | .86 | - | - | ||||
14. Average patient load | -0.05 [0.11] | 33 | .68 | ||||||||||||
15. Average patient load x Volume while speaking at nursing stations | 0.30 [0.13] | 43 | .02 | ||||||||||||
Random Components | |||||||||||||||
Between shift variance (σ2e) | 0.55 [0.74] | 0.19 [0.45] | - | - | 0.26 [0.51] | 0.25 [0.50] | |||||||||
Within shift / residual variance (σ2u0) | 0.42 [0.65] | 0.32 [0.56] | - | - | 0.16 [0.40] | 0.20 [0.45] | |||||||||
Slope variation (Volume while speaking at nursing stations) | 0.27 [0.52] | 0.16 [0.40] | |||||||||||||
Variance Modelledc | |||||||||||||||
Level 1: R2Within Shift | 0.24 | - | - | 0.62 | 0.52 | ||||||||||
Level 2: R2Between Shift | 0.65 | - | - | 0.53 | 0.55 | ||||||||||
Ran. Coef.: R2 Slope: Volume spkng at RN statns | 0 | 0.41 | |||||||||||||
Model Fit | |||||||||||||||
Deviance (-2 * Log likelihood ratio)d | 226.59 | 183.34 | 174.25 | 168.55 | |||||||||||
L. Ratio |
χ2(1) = 24.98, p < .001 |
χ2(12) = 43.25, p < .001 |
χ2(2) = 9.08, p < .05 |
f |
aThere were 89 shift segments nested within 35 shifts.
b Terms 2–9 are Level 1 main effects; Terms 10–13 are level 1 interactions; Term 14 is a Level 2 main effect; Term 15 is a cross-level interaction.
cProportion of variance explained for Level 1 (within shifts) and Level 2 (between shifts) were calculated relative to PE0, th model with only a grouping variable; Proportion of slope variation explained was calculated relative to PE3, the model with random coefficients, but no cross-level interactions.
dReduction in model deviance was tested as follows: PE0 contained only the shift grouping variable and was tested against a model without the grouping variable; PE1 included Level 1 sensor-based measures and was tested against PE0; PE2 included Level 2 task demand fixed effects and was compared to PE1; PE3 included random coefficients for Level 1 sensor-based measures and was evaluated relative to PE2, the model without random coefficients; PE4 included cross level interactions between Level 1 and Level 2 predictors and was evaluated relative to PE3.
eNo Level 2 task demand variables were retained as significant in PE2. Therefore, PE2 = PE1.
fFor PE4, model deviance was reduced, but model complexity (due to the loss of degrees of freedom by the inclusion of nonsignificant main effects for significant interactions) precluded significance testing