Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 21;10(2):e211. doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v10i2.8416

Table 2. Awareness and attitude of respondents to the use of electronic medical records (n=202).

Statements Strongly
Agree
(%)
Agree
(%)
Neutral
(%)
Disagree
(%)
Strongly Disagree
(%)
EMRs would improve quality of care and reduce errors 145 (71.78) 52 (25.74) 4 (1.98) 1 (0.50) 0 (0.00)
EMRs would improve quality of work life 140 (69.31) 57 (28.22) 5 (2.48) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
EMRs would increase patients’ satisfaction 106 (52.48) 72 (35.64) 22 (10.89) 2 (0.99) 0 (0.00)
The benefits would outweigh the cost 100 (49.50) 87 (43.07) 12 (5.94) 2 (0.99) 1 (0.50)
EMR would decrease burden on physicians 123 (60.89) 60 (29.70) 13 (6.44) 5 (2.48) 1 (0.50)
EMRs would make patients’ data accessible 152 (75.25) 48 (23.76) 2(0.99) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
EMRs would increase practice productivity 112 (55.45) 59 (29.21) 24(11.88) 5(2.48) 2 (0.99)
EMRs used in small practices is not feasible because of high capital investment and risk of insufficient return 26 (12.87) 53 (26.24) 33 (16.34) 73(36.14) 17 (8.42)
A possible barrier to the use of EMRs is administrative rigidity 102 (50.50) 76 (37.62) 11 (5.45) 13 (6.44) 0 (0.00)
EMRs cannot be used without the availability of skilled resources and support 99 (49.01) 84 (41.58) 7 (3.47) 10 (4.95) 2 (0.99)
Users resistance to EMRs due to fear of the negative consequences of the technology is a barrier 71 (35.15) 80 (39.60) 29 (14.36) 19 (9.41) 3 (1.49)
Proper training would be required 130 (64.36) 68 (33.66) 2 (0.99) 2 (0.99) 0 (0.00)
I would devote time to undergo training for its implementation 95 (47.03) 87 (43.07) 15 (7.43) 5 (2.48) 0 (0.00)
An EMR system should be implemented in LUTH 149 (73.76) 50 (24.75) 3 (1.49) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)