Table 2.
WES filtering strategy | Total % solved | Group 1 % solved | Group 2 % solved |
---|---|---|---|
Consanguineous and/or >1 patient Autosomal recessive (AR) X-linked (XLR) |
68% (27/40) | 65% (17/26) | 71% (10/14) |
Non-consanguineous, 1 patient Autosomal recessive (AR) X-linked (XLR and XLD) Autosomal dominant (AD) |
56% (30/54) of which 15% de novo (8/54) | 59% (22/37) | 47% (8/17) |
94 patients were subject to WES analysis. WES-data was filtered according to the presumed pattern of disease inheritance, where consanguinity or involvement of >1 patient were indicative of a recessively inherited disorder and non-consanguineous families with a single patient were likely to cover both, recessively inherited and dominant de novo mutations.