Skip to main content
. 2018 May 22;17(4):343–355. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12207

Table 4.

Predictors for postoperative patency and pregnancy

First author Year Patient number Surgical procedure Patency rate (%) Predictor P‐value Pregnancy rate (%) Predictor P‐value
Bolduc38 2007 747 MVV 86 Type of ligature at the vasectomy .006 53 Identification of intraoperative motile sperm .004
Presence of a granuloma .004 Obstructive interval .003
Identification of intraoperative motile sperm <.001 Same female partner .002
Obstructive interval .005 Previous pregnancy .020
Postoperative semen α‐glucosidase <.040
Gerrard67 2007 294 VV/VE 89 Obstructive interval .019 54 Obstructive interval .025
Presence of intraoperative sperm .001 Presence of intraoperative sperm 0.033
Hinz68 2008 212 VV/VE 93 72 Partner's age .014
Silber score .028
Hinz69 2009 351 VV/VE 93 Presence of a granuloma .029 62 Silber score .018
Magheli70 2009 334 VV/VE 97 63 Partner's age .018
Hinz71 2010 315 VV/VE 93 61 Partner's age .045
Preoperative serum LH .030
Hsiao72 2011 206 25 Preoperative serum FSH .010
Peng41 2012 53 MVE 72 Epididymal fullness <.001 32
Bilateral anastomosis .024
Corpus anastomosis .004
Motile sperm with flowing epididymal fluid .022
Ostrowski73 2014 3315 VV/VE 60 Same female partner <.001
Ramasamy74 2015 1331 MVV 98 Identification of intraoperative motile sperm <.001
Clear gross fluid .01
Surgeon's experience .014
Majzoub75 2017 139 MVV/MVE 50 Bilateral MVV .001
Presence of intraoperative sperm .001

FSH, follicle‐stimulating hormone; LH, luteinizing hormone; MVE, microscopic vasoepididymostomy; MVV, microscopic vasovasostomy; VE, vasoepididymostomy; VV, vasovasostomy.