Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 29;8(18):9503–9515. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4456

Table 2.

Visual stomach contents including percent prey contribution (%N), frequency of occurrence (%O), percent weight (%W), and index of relative importance (%IRI) based on 31 individuals (all Plectropomus spp. combined)

Caesionidae Labridae Pomacentridae Labridae (Scarinae) Acanthuridae Serranidae Siganidae Crustacea Gobiidae Apogonidae
%N 26.3 23.7 23.7 5.3 2.6 5.3 2.6 5.3 2.6 2.6
%O 32.3 25.8 19.4 6.5 3.2 6.5 3.2 6.5 3.2 3.2
%W 45.1 9.0 8.9 17.4 9.1 5.2 7.7 0.6 0.9 0.5
%IRI 34.9 16.0 15.9 11.1 5.7 5.1 5.1 2.9 1.7 1.5

Stomachs of 226 individuals (–171—P. leopardus, –43—P. laevis, –12—P. maculatus) were examined but only 31 had stomach contents identifiable to family. Prey weight was not adjusted for partial digestion, and consequently, %W and %IRI are likely underestimated for some families.