Table 2.
Results of the principal component analysis based on the mothers’ reports.
| Interaction restrictions | Monitoring SN use | Access restrictions | Technical mediation | Superv./co-use | Interpr. mediation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logging in to child’s profile to read messages | –.035 | .878 | –.007 | –.011 | –.067 | –.068 |
| Checking child’s SN page | .020 | .755 | .092 | –.005 | .079 | .074 |
| Checking added contacts to child’s SN | .072 | .871 | .021 | –.005 | .041 | .024 |
| Watching when the child uses the I | .062 | .016 | .045 | .032 | .809 | –.014 |
| Helping the child using the I | –.061 | .111 | –.096 | .017 | .783 | .016 |
| Being around when the child uses the I | .080 | –.113 | .222 | –.086 | .730 | –.002 |
| Software to limit I access in time | –.067 | –.060 | .155 | .767 | –.043 | .048 |
| Software to block access to certain websites | .116 | .042 | –.077 | .799 | .022 | –.039 |
| Discussed that not everything online is true | –.041 | .016 | –.089 | .104 | .124 | .690 |
| Discussed the potential dangers of the I | .054 | –.008 | .075 | –.094 | –.126 | .809 |
| Rules – the time the child can spend online | –.020 | –.006 | .743 | .066 | .115 | .013 |
| Rules – times of the day the child can be online | –.043 | .105 | .822 | .058 | –.043 | –.028 |
| Rules – the use of the I in the bedroom | .140 | .017 | .764 | –.039 | .046 | .010 |
| Rules – the pictures the child can post online | .792 | –0.31 | .154 | –.045 | –.033 | .003 |
| Rules – the information the child can share | .820 | –.012 | .024 | –.023 | .011 | .010 |
| Rules – with whom the child can chat | .863 | .019 | –.082 | .100 | .014 | –.012 |
| Rules – who the child can add to SN | .834 | .072 | –.065 | .014 | .034 | .016 |
| Explained variance (R2) | 27.23% | 10.52% | 9.65% | 7.36% | 7.13% | 6.13% |
SN = social network; I = internet; Superv. = supervision; Interpret. = interpretative.