Table 4.

Parental mediation strategies as perceived by the child, the mother and the father, with parent-child paired samples t-test.

	Child			Mother			Father
	Range (M)	SD	α	Range (M)	SD	α	Range (M)	SD	α	F
Interaction restr.	0–1(.39) (i)	.38	.808	0–1(.58) (i)	.41	.859	0–1(.48) (i)	.43	.887	32.73***
Monitoring SN use	1–5(1.71) (i)	.85	.718	1–5(2.19) (i, ii)	.93	.812	1–4.67(1.74) (ii)	.83	.809	34.37***
Access restrictions	0–1(.47) (i)	.37	.626	0–1(.59) (i)	.39	.756	0–1(.53) (i)	.41	.773	15.62***
Technical mediation	0–1(.08)	.24	.482	0–1(.11)	.25	.413	0–1(.10)	.24	.402	1.44*
Interpret. mediation	0–1(.87) (i)	.29	.594	0–1(.97) (i, ii)	.14	.243	0–1(.90) (ii)	.26	.702	20.82***
Supervision/co-use	1–4.33(2.40) (i)	.75	.538	1–5(2.78) (i, ii)	.84	.730	1–4.33(2.42) (ii)	.80	.679	28.15***

Note: α = Cronbach’s alpha/KR20; restr. = restrictions; Interpret. = interpretative; Level of significance for the difference between the child and each respective parent, tested by repeated measures ANOVA, Wilk’s Lambda **p < .01, ***p < .001; (i) and (ii) = outcome for the post-hoc pairwise comparison (Bonferroni), different actors’ outcomes differ significantly.