Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 18;16:211. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1508-1

Table 3.

The results of association analysis between relative expressions of genes in tumoral tissues compared with ANCTs and patients’ clinicopathological data (up/downregulation of genes was defined based on relative expression of each gene in tumoral tissue compared with the paired ANCT)

IFNG upregulation IFNG downregulation P value IFNG-AS1 upregulation IFNG-AS1 downregulation P value
Age 0.63 0.5
 < 40 8 (67.6%) 3 (27.3%) 9 (81.8%) 2 (18.2%)
 40–50 10 (58.2%) 7 (41.2%) 11 (64.7%) 6 (35.3%)
 51–60 10 (76.9%) 3 (23.1%) 10 (76.9%) 3 (23.1%)
 61–70 5 (62.5%) 3 (37.5%) 5 (62.5%) 3 (37.5%)
 > 71 2 (40%) 3 (60%) 2 (40%) 3 (60%)
Stage 0.95 0.25
 1 9 (56.3%) 7 (43.7%) 10 (62.5%) 6 (37.5%)
 2 10 (66.7%) 5 (33.3%) 9 (60%) 6 (40%)
 3 11 (68.8%) 5 (31.2%) 14 (87.5%) 2 (12.5%)
 4 4 (80%) 1 (20%) 3 (20%) 2 (80%)
Histological grade 0.87 0.91
 1 5 (62.5%) 3 (37.5%) 6 (75%) 2 (25%)
 2 16 (69.6%) 7 (30.4%) 15 (62.5%) 8 (34.8%)
 3 10 (62.5%) 6 (37.5%) 12 (75%) 4 (25%)
Mitotic rate 0.9 0.64
 1 13 (68.4%) 6 (31.6%) 14 (73.7%) 5 (26.3%)
 2 11 (61.1%) 7 (38.9%) 11 (61.1%) 7 (38.9%)
 3 3 (60%) 2 (40%) 4 (80%) 1 (20%)
Tumor size 0.7 0.67
 < 2 9 (56.3%) 7 (43.7%) 12 (75%) 4 (25%)
 2–5 22 (66.7%) 11 (33.3%) 21 (63.6%) 12 (36.4%)
 > 5 1 (100%) 0 (0%) 1 (100%) 0 (0%)
ER status 0.08 0.65
 Positive 26 (60.5%) 17 (39.5%) 29 (67.4%) 14 (32.6%)
 Negative 6 (100%) 0 (0%) 5 (16.7%) 1 (83.3%)
PR status 0.07 0.46
 Positive 22 (59.5%) 15 (40.5%) 25 (67.6%) 12 (32.4%)
 Negative 10 (90.9%) 1 (9.1%) 9 (81.8%) 2 (18.2%)
HER2 status 0.48 0.27
 Positive 7 (58.3%) 5 (41.7%) 7 (58.3%) 5 (41.7%)
 Negative 25 (69.4%) 11 (30.6%) 27 (75%) 9 (25%)