Table 4.
Comparison of expression levels of IFNG and IFNG-AS1 genes in tumoral tissue of breast cancer patients between clinicopathological-based categories (mean and SD values of (E^CTB2M/E^CTtarget gene) are presented)
| IFNG | P value | IFNG-AS1 | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| Pre-menopause vs. post-menopause | 0.02 (0.04) vs. 0.03 (0.04) | 0.59 | 0.01 (0.01) vs. 0.01 (0.02) | 0.78 |
| ER status | ||||
| ER(+) vs. ER(−) | 0.03 (0.05) vs. 0.02 (0.01) | 0.66 | 0.01 (0.02) vs. 0.01 (0.01) | 0.97 |
| PR status | ||||
| PR(+) vs. PR(−) | 0.03 (0.05) vs. 0.02 (0.02) | 0.74 | 0.01 (0.02) vs. 0.01 (0.01) | 0.92 |
| HER2 status | ||||
| HER2(+) vs. HER2(−) | 0.009 (0.01) vs. 0.03 (0.05) | 0.01 | 0.01 (0.01) vs. 0.01 (0.02) | 0.57 |
| Tumor grade | ||||
| Grade 1 vs. 2 | 0.06 (0.08) vs. 0.01 (0.03) | 0.03 | 0.02 (0.02) vs. 0.01 (0.02) | 0.73 |
| Grade 1 vs. 3 | 0.06 (0.08) vs. 0.02 (0.02) | 0.1 | 0.02 (0.02) vs. 0.01 (0.01) | 0.69 |
| Grade 2 vs. 3 | 0.01 (0.03) vs. 0.02 (0.02) | 0.89 | 0.01 (0.02) vs. 0.01 (0.01) | 0.99 |