Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 18;16:211. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1508-1

Table 4.

Comparison of expression levels of IFNG and IFNG-AS1 genes in tumoral tissue of breast cancer patients between clinicopathological-based categories (mean and SD values of (E^CTB2M/E^CTtarget gene) are presented)

IFNG P value IFNG-AS1 P value
Age
 Pre-menopause vs. post-menopause 0.02 (0.04) vs. 0.03 (0.04) 0.59 0.01 (0.01) vs. 0.01 (0.02) 0.78
ER status
 ER(+) vs. ER(−) 0.03 (0.05) vs. 0.02 (0.01) 0.66 0.01 (0.02) vs. 0.01 (0.01) 0.97
PR status
 PR(+) vs. PR(−) 0.03 (0.05) vs. 0.02 (0.02) 0.74 0.01 (0.02) vs. 0.01 (0.01) 0.92
HER2 status
 HER2(+) vs. HER2(−) 0.009 (0.01) vs. 0.03 (0.05) 0.01 0.01 (0.01) vs. 0.01 (0.02) 0.57
Tumor grade
 Grade 1 vs. 2 0.06 (0.08) vs. 0.01 (0.03) 0.03 0.02 (0.02) vs. 0.01 (0.02) 0.73
 Grade 1 vs. 3 0.06 (0.08) vs. 0.02 (0.02) 0.1 0.02 (0.02) vs. 0.01 (0.01) 0.69
 Grade 2 vs. 3 0.01 (0.03) vs. 0.02 (0.02) 0.89 0.01 (0.02) vs. 0.01 (0.01) 0.99