Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jan 17;208(3):585–594. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15908

Table 3:

Calculated EDs and conversion factors of six scan modes run with four different heart rates on a 1-year-old phantom. ED was determined using ICRP Publication 103 definition. CoVs of these quantities per scan mode are presented in percentage. For single-beat reconstruction [Snapshot Segment], 2-beat multicycle reconstruction [Snapshot Burst], and up to 4-beat multicycle reconstruction [Snapshot Burst Plus]. Three helical scans with 90-bpm were performed with a tube current three times that of the tube current of other heart rate scans, affecting the ED values. Assuming linearity of dose with tube current, we normalized the EDs, dividing by a factor of 3 to compare with EDs of the other heart rate scans; the normalized ED values are displayed in parentheses.

Scan Description Heart
Rate
(bpm)
Conversion
factor
(mSv·mGy−1·cm−1)
CoV*
Conversion
factor (%)
ED
(mSv)
CoV*
ED (%)
Axial 90 0.0940 5.59 2.9 5.59
110 0.1019 3.2
130 0.1067 3.3
150 0.1053 3.3
Axial
Padding 100 ms
90 0.0985 1.39 5.6 1.39
110 0.0984 5.6
130 0.1014 5.8
150 0.0993 5.6
Helical
Single-beat
Reconstruction
90 0.0919 1.16 (7.5) 1.16
110 0.0896 7.3
130 0.0897 7.4
150 0.0903 7.4
Helical
2-beat Multicycle
Reconstruction
90 0.0907 1.52 (8.1) 5.29
110 0.0912 7.5
130 0.0889 7.3
150 0.0884 7.3
Helical
Up to 4-beat Multicycle
Reconstruction
90 0.0925 1.45 (9.5) 4.36
110 0.0911 9.6
130 0.0905 8.9
150 0.0893 8.8
Helical TCM** 90 0.0959 2.35 6.2 3.79
110 0.0930 5.8
130 0.0924 5.9
150 0.0906 6.3
*

Coefficient of variation

**

Tube Current modulation