Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 20;7:e37124. doi: 10.7554/eLife.37124

Figure 4. Learning innate activity in a network of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that respects Dale’s Law.

Figure 4.

(a) Synaptic drive of sample neurons starting at random initial conditions in response to external stimulus prior to training. (b) Spike raster of sample neurons evoked by the same stimulus over multiple trials with random initial conditions. (c) Single spike perturbation of an untrained network. (d)-(f) Synaptic drive, multi-trial spiking response and single spike perturbation in a trained network. (g) The average phase deviation of theta neurons due to single spike perturbation. (h) Left, distribution of eigenvalues of the recurrent connectivity before and after training as a function their absolution values. Right, Eigenvalue spectrum of the recurrent connectivity; gray circle has unit radius. (i) The accuracy of quasi-static approximation in untrained networks and the performance of trained networks as a function of coupling strength J and synaptic time constant τs. Color bar shows the Pearson correlation between predicted and actual synaptic drive in untrained networks (left) and innate and actual synaptic drive in trained networks (right).