Table 1. Overview of recorded NAc units and their relationship to task variables at various time epochs.
Percentage is relative to the number of cue-modulated units (n = 133).
| Task parameter | Total | MSN | MSN | FSI | FSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All units | 443 | 155 | 216 | 27 | 45 |
| Rat ID | |||||
| R053 | 145 | 51 | 79 | 4 | 11 |
| R056 | 70 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 28 |
| R057 | 136 | 55 | 75 | 3 | 3 |
| R060 | 92 | 37 | 49 | 3 | 3 |
| Analysed units | 344 | 117 | 175 | 18 | 34 |
| Cue modulated units | 133 | 24 | 85 | 6 | 18 |
| GLM aligned to cue-onset | |||||
| Cue identity | 42 (32%) | 9 (38%) | 25 (29%) | 0 (-) | 8 (44%) |
| Cue location | 55 (41%) | 11 (46%) | 33 (39%) | 3 (50%) | 8 (44%) |
| Cue outcome | 26 (20%) | 5 (21%) | 15 (18%) | 1 (17%) | 5 (28%) |
| Approach behaviour | 32 (24%) | 8 (33%) | 19 (22%) | 2 (33%) | 3 (17%) |
| Trial length | 22 (17%) | 5 (21%) | 14 (16%) | 0 (-) | 3 (17%) |
| Trial number | 42 (32%) | 11 (46%) | 20 (24%) | 1 (17%) | 10 (56%) |
| Trial history | 8 (6%) | 1 (4%) | 5 (6%) | 0 (-) | 1 (6%) |
| GLM aligned to nosepoke | |||||
| Cue identity | 28 (21%) | 3 (13%) | 17 (20%) | 2 (33%) | 6 (33%) |
| Cue location | 30 (23%) | 2 (8%) | 21 (25%) | 2 (33%) | 5 (28%) |
| Cue outcome | 23 (17%) | 2 (8%) | 14 (16%) | 1 (17%) | 6 (33%) |
| GLM aligned to outcome | |||||
| Cue identity | 25 (19%) | 4 (17%) | 15 (18%) | 2 (33%) | 4 (22%) |
| Cue location | 31 (23%) | 5 (21%) | 23 (27%) | 0 (-) | 3 (17%) |
| Cue outcome | 34 (26%) | 6 (25%) | 15 (18%) | 4 (67%) | 9 (50%) |