Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Oct 25;32(2):190–204. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1238494

Table 1.

Results of cluster based permutation analyses in the all conditions in Experiment 1. The time window where the Target significantly exceeded that of each distractor is reported in ms, followed by the Cluster t statistic and Monte Carlo p value for that window, in parentheses. Time window is measured from the onset of the spoken sentence, which was 2550 ms in duration. The onset of the sentence final target was at 2036 ms post sentence onset.

Target vs.
Agent-Related
Target vs.
Action-Related
Target vs.
Unrelated
Repeat Condition 1300 – 2550 ms (t = 183.3, p = .001) 1050 – 2550 ms (t = 142.7, p = .0009) 1050 – 2550 ms (t = 232.4, p = .001)
Generalise Condition 1400 – 2550 ms (t = 143.0, p = .0008) 2250 – 2550 ms (t = 51.6, p = .0008) 1250 – 2550 ms (t = 179.3, p = .0008)