Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct;26(3):190–194. doi: 10.5455/aim.2018.26.190-194

Table 2. The mean scores of experts.

No. Main criterion Secondary criterion Sum of scores Mean scores of experts
1 Quality Investment on technologic planning and innovations 113 7.53
2 Successful contracts 106 7.07
3 Extent of provision of information security 121 8.07
4 Extent of knowledge transfer 112 7.47
5 Motivation Concentration of the major capabilities 125 8.33
6 Access to outsource expertise/skills 119 7.93
7 Flexibility 120 8.00
8 Innovation and fast provision of services 106 7.07
9 Risk management Concluding short-term contracts or change in the contract periodically to enhance flexibility 108 7.20
10 Keeping key capacities inside the company in spite of technology outsourcing 111 7.40
11 Employing an expert for legal issues to mitigate the legal risks 107 7.13
12 Proper selection of contractor 109 7.27
13 Strategic decisions Contribution of the project in achieving the organizational objectives 114 7.60
14 Increasing the capacity for using key resources 117 7.80
15 Being responsive to ever-changing technology in the world 110 7.33
16 Characteristics of the provider and characteristics of the technology required 109 7.27
17 Risks Information security risks 114 7.60
18 Inefficient estimation of resources and time, poor management and planning 110 7.33
19 outsourcer or provider lack of skills in IT outsourcing projects 106 7.07
20 Leaving project by the key figures of the project 105 7.00
21 Breach of contract by the provider and the risks associated with legal matters 113 7.53
22 Selection of provider Similar experience 109 7.27
23 Extent of trust to the provider 107 7.13
24 Timely delivery 112 7.47
25 Quality of the provider management 105 7.00
26 Financial Allocation of sufficient financial resources 108 7.20
27 Defining a predictable cost structure 107 7.13
28 Management and human resources costs 115 7.67
29 Consideration of hidden and variable costs 110 7.33
30 Suitable budgeting and scheduling 109 7.27