Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 19;8(11):98. doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0134-z

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards model) in the subsets of AML patients with Ara-C induction therapy and HDAC consolidation therapy: OS (HSCT-censored) and EFS (HSCT-censored)

OS HSCT-censored EFS HSCT-censored
AC ind.a HDAC cons.b AC ind. MDACCc AC ind. HDAC cons. AC ind. MDACC
HRd (95% CI; p-value) HR (95% CI; p-value) HR (95% CI; p-value) HRd (95% CI; p-value) HR (95% CI; p-value) HR (95% CI; p-value)
Unadjusted 1.009 (1.000–1.017; 0.044) 1.014 (1.004–1.024; 0.007) 1.011 (1.000–1.022; 0.049) 1.008 (1.001–1.015; 0.022) 1.012 (1.004–1.020; 0.003) 1.009 (1.000–1.017; 0.049)
Adjusted for age, gender, risk group, FLT3-TKD 1.007 (0.997–1.018; 0.159) 1.010 (0.999–1.022; 0.078) 1.009 (0.998–1.020; 0.117) 1.008 (1.000–1.017; 0.040) 1.011 (1.002–1.020; 0.014) 1.009 (1.000–1.018; 0.039)
Adjusted for age, gender, risk group, NPM1 1.006 (0.995–1.017; 0.266) 1.008 (0.996–1.020; 0.196) 1.009 (0.997–1.021; 0.147) 1.008 (0.999–1.017; 0.075) 1.010 (1.000–1.020; 0.047) 1.008 (0.998–1.018; 0.102)

aPatients receiving AraC induction treatment

bPatients receiving high-dose AraC consolidation therapy

cPatients in the M.D. Anderson cohort receiving AraC induction therapy, not adjusted for risk group, due to all patients belonging to the intermediate risk group

dHazard Ratio (HR) for a one-unit increase in SAMHD1 percent positive blasts