Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2018 Nov;159(11):2318–2330. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001336

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Effect of mechanical “conditioning” stimulation of the forepaw on electrically evoked “test” EMG reflexes in the cranial tibial muscle of the contralateral hindlimb. Clip was applied at time 0 for 20 secs. In the control group EMG responses to the test stimulus were reduced (greater % reduction in EMG) during clip application, indicating antinociception and a DNIC effect. When all time points were considered DNIC in the OA group (n = 11) was significantly less compared to control animals (n = 12) (P=0.016). Responses are medians, errors are 75th percentiles.