Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 2;47(5):20170389. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170389

Table 2.

Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR+, LR− and DOR values from each selected article

Prevalence True positive False positive False negative True negative Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) LR+ LR− DOR
Cevidanes et al19 0.76 62 10 18 14 78.00 58.00 73.58 63.73 1.85 0.37 4.89
Dias et al21 0.40 10 2 9 26 53.00 93.00 88.33 66.42 7.57 0.50 14.98
Kim et al20 b 0.41 180 278 129 152 58.00 35.00 47.15 45.45 0.89 1.20 0.74
Talaat et al22 0.31 36 31 4 55 90.00 64.00 71.42 86.48 2.50 0.15 16.00

DOR, diagnostic odds ratio; LR, likelihood ratio; NPV, negative predicative value; PPV, positive predicative value.

a

studies using CBCT.

b

study using CT.