Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Perinatol. 2018 May 4;35(13):1297–1302. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1649482

Table 2.

A sonographic estimate of fetal weight is associated with cesarean delivery

Variable Cesarean delivery (N = 139) Vaginal delivery (N = 165) p-Value Adjusted odds ratioa 95% confidence interval
US-EFW 119 (85.6)b 112 (67.9) < 0.001 2.23 1.16–4.28
Birth weight (kg) 3.519 ± 0.58 3.260 ± 0.46 < 0.001 2.41 1.42–4.08
Induction of labor 93 (66.9) 105 (63.6) 0.55 0.72 0.41–1.24
Type of diabetes
 A2 76 (54.7) 114 (69.1) 0.03 (Ref)
 Type 2 30 (21.6) 28 (17.0) 1.05 0.55–2.02
 Type 1 33 (23.7) 23 (13.9) 1.83 0.93–3.62
Maternal age at delivery (y) 31.7 ± 5.5 31.6 ± 5.2 0.87 1.04 0.99–1.09
Maternal BMI at delivery (kg/m2) 37.2 ± 8.3 33.4 ± 6.3 < 0.001 1.08 1.04–1.12

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; US-EFW, ultrasound-estimated fetal weight.

a

Adjusted for ultrasound-estimated fetal weight, birth weight, induction of labor, type of diabetes, maternal age, maternal BMI.

b

Data presented are mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables, N (%) for categorical variables.