Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 15;9:1955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01955

Table 7.

Summary of hierarchical regression analysis for variables predicting depersonalized in-group trust (Study 2).

Predictor Model 1
Model 2
β CI (95%) p β CI (95%) p
Step 1
   Gendera 0.071 [0.003, 0.235] 0.045 0.079 [0.014, 0.247] 0.028
   Age 0.014 [-0.050, 0.071] 0.725 0.015 [-0.049, 0.072] 0.714
   Marital statusb -0.010 [-0.157, 0.123] 0.809 <0.001 [-0.141, 0.140] 0.996
   Political orientation -0.073 [-0.113, 0.003] 0.062 -0.069 [-0.110, 0.005] 0.076
   Religiosity 0.008 [-0.052, 0.064] 0.839 0.010 [-0.050, 0.066] 0.791
   SES -0.046 [-0.055, 0.013] 0.221 -0.031 [-0.049, 0.020] 0.416
   Employment statusc 0.048 [-0.043, 0.196] 0.208 0.027 [-0.079, 0.166] 0.490
   Step 2
   Perceived impact EC 0.083 [0.006, 0.118] 0.030
   R2 0.016 0.022
   Adjusted R2 0.007 0.012
   F 1.837 2.203*
   ΔR2 0.006
   ΔF 4.703*

SES, socioeconomic status; EC, economic crisis. aWoman = 0, Man = 1; bUnmarried = 0, Married = 1. cNot unemployed = 0, Unemployed = 1. p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.