Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Life Sci Space Res (Amst). 2018 Mar 7;17:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.lssr.2018.03.002

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Inter-reader scoring variability on low, moderate, and high activity cages. Three independent readers were tasked with scoring 7 cages that had been pre-selected for exemplifying different stages of behavior as detailed in Table 2. No significant differences were observed for scores on the same cage between reviewers (ANOVA, p>0.05). Reviewers were able to reliably delineate between low, moderate, and high activity cages (Student’s t-test, p<0.05).