Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Oct 22.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Oct 28;154(2):309–318. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3604-z

Table 3.

Pre and post intervention levels of estrogen and progesterone (urinary conjugate, ng/mL) and hormonally sensitive breast tissue (MR imaging) among premenopausal women at elevated risk for breast cancer (N = 135 for hormonal data, N = 68 for imaging data)

N Pre level [95 % CI] Post level [95 % CI]


Control Low dose High dose Control Low dose High dose

Estrogen (ng/mL)
 Follicular 135 790
[687, 908]
785
[674, 915]
802
[694, 927]
882
[767, 1014]
769
[659, 898]
804
[693, 932]
 Luteal 135 499
[418, 599]
487
[400, 592]
541
[449, 651]
519
[434, 621]
511
[419, 624]
579
[479, 702]
Progesterone (ng/mL)
 Follicular 135 18.8
[15.5, 22.8]
19.5
[15.8, 24.0]
19.2
[15.7, 23.4]
20.0
[16.5 24.2]
20.2
[16.3, 25.0]
18.1
[14.7, 22.2]
 Luteal 135 54.1
[44.7, 65.6]
62.2
[50.4, 76.7]
61.3
[50.2, 74.8]
51.2
[42.2, 62.1]
57.7
[46.5, 71.5]
66.6
[54.2, 81.9]
Imaging outcome (cm2)
 Background parenchymal
 enhancement (cm2)
68a 263
[213, 326]
268
[214, 337]
265
[215, 327]
317
[256, 392]
289
[229, 364]
234
[188, 292]
a

Measured in a subset of participants, image acquisition during follicular phase at months 1 and 7